PDA

View Full Version : Mazda B2600 4by


64CJ6Willy
01-02-2012, 07:07 PM
Anyone have one of these trucks? Or had one. I'm interested in any probs that you had, or warnings about them. The pros and cons so I can make a decent decision on one. Thanks.

Tunabomber
01-02-2012, 07:10 PM
the only guy i know who had one drove it way longer than a normal truck would have lasted :dontknow:

64CJ6Willy
01-02-2012, 07:13 PM
the only guy i know who had one drove it way longer than a normal truck would have lasted :dontknow:

Thanks Eric. Had one offered up on trade for something I have.

Punk in Drublic
01-02-2012, 07:30 PM
what year?
when ford bought mazda they basicaly beccame a ford ranger.

64CJ6Willy
01-02-2012, 07:34 PM
** 1994

stumanchu
01-02-2012, 08:20 PM
i had one..\
it was a 2600.. extracab..
good truck...
beat the shit out of it... and it took it...

arjan
01-02-2012, 10:10 PM
I am pretty sure the 1994 is the rebadged ford ranger. The older ones were more popular.

Punk in Drublic
01-02-2012, 10:36 PM
yep its a ford ranger, prolly has the 4.0. 94:confused0006: i dont think they were using ttb anymore.

Zibi
01-02-2012, 10:49 PM
The 2600 has a 2.6l engine

The 4000 had the 4.0l

Punk in Drublic
01-02-2012, 11:24 PM
ah 10-4
and it could be ether a d28 or d35 in the front.

Zibi
01-02-2012, 11:36 PM
from what I remember they're pretty solid little trucks, was looking into buying one 4 or 5 years ago

Bigsexy
01-03-2012, 12:48 AM
buddy of mine had one yrs ago, rollin on sum 35" boggers.. wasnt a bad lil truck..was the 4000i i do believe, lots of drunken late nite beatings and it took it.

64CJ6Willy
01-03-2012, 10:09 AM
kewl. Thanks all

Metal Mulisha
01-03-2012, 01:46 PM
ive got a '92 B2600, drive it everyday for commuting, bought it over 3 years ago, its got 260,000 km's. So far so good

hrd4mud
01-03-2012, 02:15 PM
sure it's not a 93 ? 94 was first year of the ranger version and though the only 4 banger was the 2.3 which I had one of those was a pos. has TTY front very weak rear springs underpowered got worse mileage then a v6 cause motor was always working so hard

if its the older version the 2.2 and 2.6 are Mitsubishi motors had one of them was very peppy fun little truck and would have the ifs front. same motors used by Chrysler in kcars

64CJ6Willy
01-03-2012, 03:54 PM
1994 Maz B2600
http://i480.photobucket.com/albums/rr161/Renegade92_photos/photo1.jpg

Redneck_04
01-03-2012, 06:09 PM
my dad has a 93 my bro has a 91 and my neighboor has a 90 they all have over 25xxxxx on them they all are excellent on gas and they all burn about a lil oil on start up. everyone i know that has them likes them. except there easy to steal so all 3 have those niffty break club locks! no problems since

Redneck_04
01-03-2012, 06:11 PM
and its only about 50 bucks for a full tank of gas

4skin
01-03-2012, 06:51 PM
sure it's not a 93 ? 94 was first year of the ranger version and though the only 4 banger was the 2.3 which I had one of those was a pos. has TTY front very weak rear springs underpowered got worse mileage then a v6 cause motor was always working so hard

if its the older version the 2.2 and 2.6 are Mitsubishi motors had one of them was very peppy fun little truck and would have the ifs front. same motors used by Chrysler in kcars
the 2,3 was a better motor than the mitsi
last one i had had 375000 k on it when i turbocharged it
and had 420000k on it when i finaly blew the headgasket
didnt like 38lbs o boost:dontknow: